Let me start by saying that I don't get the Tennis Channel, and Indy's ATP tournament is waning in relevance, so I don't have many opportunities to see world-class tennis except when the Slams are on. Even then, the networks tend to focus only on Americans or the biggest stars. So if you want real insight into tennis check out Craig Hickman's Tennis Blog or Savannah's World.
But I do love the game, and I watch it as much as I can. Right now the men's tour far surpasses the women's in terms of competitiveness, interest, and all-around excellence of top tier players. (Pains me to say so, but it's true.) So my top moments are almost all about testosterone.
The countdown:#5 Venus vs. Serena for the Wimbledon titleLong after everyone had stopped looking for a truly competitive match between these two (there always seemed to be complicated familial ambivalence about winning on both sides of the court) , they came at each other with everything they had and threw it down. And somewhat to my surprise, Venus came up the winner. Sure, Wimbledon is

where Venus famously plays her best, and she was on pace. But I

have seen enough of Serena to know that you can
never count her out, even if she's down 1-6, 0-4--she's still going to win the match; you watch. But this time she didn't, and you can tell that she was, well...kinda pissed. But she recovered enough to go out later that day and take the ladies' doubles title with her sister, and an Olympic gold medal with the same partner later in the summer.
#4 Rafael Nadal vs. Roger Federer for the Roland Garros titleOK, this was sort of expected, because Rafa is the king of clay court tennis. He's played 22 matches at Roland
Garros over a period of four years--and he's never lost. In fact, all the drama came from his perennial opponent, Roger
Federer, but for the most unlikely reasons. Roger, who for years has b

eaten everyone on every surface--except for Rafa on clay--suddenly looked vulnerable. He is presumed to be the greatest player who ever lived, yet he is still chasing Borg's achievements and
Sampras's Wimbledon record, and NOW the pundits are starting to say invincible Roger may be running out of time. (Please don't believe it.)
Rafa beat Roger, matching Bjorn Borg's record of winning four consecutive French Opens. But for the first time, I felt myself pulling for Roger a little. I don't like punishing dominance, which is what made it so hard for me to root for Roger in the past. Until 2008, the outcome of Roger vs. anybody-but-Rafa-at-Roland
Garros was a forgone conclusion. Roger has the greatest game of all time, but I began to wonder...is he tanking? Is something in his head?
#3 Novak Djokovic vs. Everyone for the Australian titleThe 20-year old Serbian phenom didn't drop a set on the way to the final,
inclu
ding his semifinal defeat of defending champion Roger
Federer (this is when cracks in the
Federer armor first appeared). It was closer than a straight set victory sounds: 7–5, 6–3, 7–6(5), which in my mind proves
Djokovic's mettle. Then he defeated Jo-
Wilifred Tsonga in a four-set final. A lot of people are annoyed by
Djokovic and his interminable ball-bouncing and on-court antics; but I love his intensity. He reminds me of John McEnroe, which is a good thing.
Djokovic's defeat of
Federer meant it would be the first Grand Slam tournament won by someone other than
Nadal or
Federer since 2005, and the first in 10 straight Slams in which
Federer did not appear in the final. So I had to thank
Novak for giving me something new to look at. I stayed up all night to watch this tournament unfold live, night after night! BTW, the year ended as it began.
Djokovic won the first Slam in January, and then he took the Master's Series in November. (
Nadal and
Federer both injured though.)
#2 Roger Federer vs. Rafael Nadal for the Wimbledon title
This has been called the greatest tennis match in history, and I agree. Even McEnroe said so (in fact, I think he was first in line to say so). It had everything: two players with contrasting styles and temperaments; two players who have faced each other over and over; two players who have proven themselves indomitable on specific surfaces--each trying to take away the other's turf (no pun
intended). It was five sets long: 6-4, 6-4, 6-7 (5-7), 6-7 (8-10), and because the fifth set in a Slam cannot be decided by a tiebreaker, the final set went to 9-7. It was
Rafel Nadal who prevailed, with Roger doing everything humanly possible to prevent it. It was eight hours of the best tennis ever played, nighttime when it ended, and the winner was tennis itself.
#1 Roger Federer vs. Andy Murray for the U.S. Open titleHeading into September 2008, Roger
Federer had yet to win a Grand Slam tou

rnament--something that ha
dn't happened since 2003.
Nadal had yet to prove himself on a hard court (at least at a Slam), so there was a very open feeling to the Open. James Blake looked good,
Novak Djokovic was my pick to win, and Andy Murray broke through convincingly. But in the end it was
Federer who won it (for the fifth consecutive time), and for the first time, I was all smiles. I have always been in awe of the man's game, but exasperated by his dominance. The newly vulnerable
Federer of 2008 changed my view. Now I want him to finish it out--to surpass Pete
Sampras's 14 Grand Slam singles titles and 7 Wimbledon titles. He deserves it, and I hope he gets it. He has raised the standards of the game as much as any of the all-time greats. I hope 2009 brings great things for Roger.